The perils of learning management systems

2010 February 1
by Ron Bronson

A former student alerted me to this article, which is an interview with Kyle Jones, a librarian in Darien, CT.

It’s a great interview about using an open source tool like Wordpress as a learning management system over Blackboard or other tools. I encourage you to check it out.

I hadn’t used Blackboard much as a student, but since I started teaching a hybrid class (2/3rds online, 1/3rd in the classroom) I’d become pretty adept at it. We switched to a new LMS this semester, but it’s still fraught with a lot of the problems I attribute to these proprietary “learning” tools.

The closed environment of IM, chat, message boards within most learning management tools are all offered as some way to increase student and teacher interaction and to simulate the classroom experience. But it doesn’t work as well as it should. With many students already adept with Twitter, Facebook and existing tools, I never understood why so many institutions felt it was necessary to implement (often expensive) third party applications that reinvent the wheel and lack the relevance of use other than as a medium for classroom “interaction.”

After three terms of teaching my class, I finally decided to experiment with the tools I’d already been using, especially since I teach a course to aspiring web professionals and so much of what we do takes place online. Students now create their own Twitter accounts if they don’t already have one and create a tumblr blog. In addition to the course books used for class discussions, there’s a course text in the form of a blog that gets updated several times a day with information such as articles, posts from me on whatever ties back to discussions we’ve had or ones we’ll have later in the term. Students produce most of their response papers via their tumblr blogs and future conversations are woven into Twitter.

The idea here, is to get students engaged into the conversations that are already happening in the wider world. So much of what happens in the classroom can happen in a vacuum and I felt like it was important to help them understand that other people were having many of the conversations we’d had, have asked many of the same questions and the places to find insights and information they might be seeking out.

While this is all one facet of the course experience, it’s a good way to provide extra value in the form of tools that might have value beyond the classroom. Whereas, an LMS doesn’t offer you much value when you’re done. You use it, you finish the courses and it stays behind.

Sharing is caring:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
5 Responses leave one →
  1. 2010 February 1

    Right on:
    “[a closed] LMS doesn’t offer you much value when you’re done. You use it, you finish the courses and it stays behind.”

    Give students something extensible. Something they can take with them.

    ~k~
    @thecorkboard

  2. 2010 February 2

    I have used a combination of LMS (blackboard, D2L, WebCT…) with course web pages I created and public freeware (yahoo groups…). I agree that using social networking ware like twitter or for more in depth conversations, blogs, helps to create a more open environment and invites longer term involvement with the subject matter.

  3. 2010 February 2

    Thanks for the reply, David!

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. WordPress as LMS Interview at WPMU.org | thecorkboard
  2. Tweets that mention edustir -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS